Reinhardt: Whom do corporate boards represent?
February 20, 2009
Uwe Reinhardt posted a nice summary of Bebchuk and Fried’s “Pay Without Performance,” which assesses the reasons why executive compensation differs from “optimal contracting.” Bebchuk and Fried argue that CEOs basically set their own pay, subject to an “outrage constraint,” which Reinhardt notes has become stricter with the downturn. (Witness execs of bailed-out companies being excoriated for consuming their usual perks.) I’d like to see more analysis of when and why public outrage has bite. I would think that shareholder protest votes — and the threat of takeover or sell-off that lies behind them — would be a part of the story.
Entry Filed under: Uncategorized. .
1 Comment Add your own
Leave a Comment
Some HTML allowed:
<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <pre> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>
Trackback this post | Subscribe to the comments via RSS Feed
1.
James McRitchie | March 5, 2009 at 7:12 pm
Also outrageous is the fact that Bank of America hosted a call in which political activists and business officials were urged to funnel millions of dollars of political contributions to vulnerable members of Congress so they would vote against Employee Free Choice Act. This influence-peddling session took place three days after Bank of America received $25 billion in federal bailout funds.